BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND TWITTER BACKGROUNDS
Showing posts with label Questions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Questions. Show all posts

7/19/11

Formspring Question #213--Candidate Enthusiasm Edition

Have you ever been genuinely enthusiastic about a presidential candidate? is there anyone you would look forward to supporting in 2012?
It is safe to stipulate I was excited in general to cast my first ballot ever in 1996, yes? I doubt Bob Dole sent a Chris Matthews-esque tingle up anyone’s leg at the time. He certainly did not thrill me. But you always remember your first. In that election, I was like most voters--I voted against the other guy rather than for my guy. Does everyone not pretty much settle for a candidate more often than not?

Keeping in mind I am only 34 with only four presidential elections I have been eligible to vote in, the only time I have ever been excited for a candidate was George W. Bush in 2000. He seemed like a genuine Christian conservative. These days, I do not doubt his Christianity, but his conservatism is in question. By 2004, I voted for him out of respect for his efforts in combating terrorism, but mostly was voting against John Kerry.

The deal was that I had been interested in politics from an age when virtually no kid is. I first seriously followed the 1988 presidential election when I was eleven. It was all because of the influence of my Bob Jones affiliated school. You may recall I have mentioned the constant Antichrist watch we were all on. There was something about the religious undertone of the election--pat Robertson claiming God told him to run, Bush saying atheists ought not be citizens, and the general scandals among televangelists creating an air of declining Christian values made the election feel like a spiritual battle. Besides, Michael Dykakis was a Massachusetts progressive. The epitome of all that is evil in the world, as it were.

The notion a presidential election had spiritual consequences sticks with me even now. Considering how the religious views of candidates are a major deal, it must concern a whole lot of people, whether they will admit it or not. It is evidence God exists. We feel His influence in such matters the same way the moon pulls the tides.

Back to a more personal level, the BJU Christians panicked when bill Clinton won election in 1992. Here was a pro-choice, pro-guys rights, pot smoking hippie who acknowledged Elvis Presley sang more than Gospel songs. These folks did not like jimmy Carter, either, but at least the ex-peanut farmer had a moral compass. I do not recall anyone claiming Clinton was the Antichrist, though I do believe there were some who thought his uncanny ability to make people genuinely believe he could feel their pain was unnatural. Regardless of his demonic status, there was certainly a sense our country was beyond god’s blessing for having elected him.

Beating him in 1996 became a holy cause. Literally. Jerry Falwell peddled videos at the time claiming Clinton had murdered political enemies in his rise to power in Arkansas. Pat Robertson credited the GOP takeover a congress in 1994 to god blessing the Republican party in its battle against Clinton’s evil progressivism. I was not particularly skeptical of any of this, either at the time.

I entered the university of South Carolina in 1995 and soon ingratiated myself with the College Republican crowd. I may be heavily criticized for this, but young republicans in South Carolina very much resemble Bill Mahers smear of the GOP in its entirely as Bible thumping Civil War re-enactors. I was already beginning to purge a lot of fundamentalism by this point, but Clinton’s defeat still resonated as a holy cause even though I was more in tune with the yuppie aspects of being a pre-law student involved in politics. If dole was not all that exciting, at least no one had spent the better part of four years convincing me he was eager to turn the united states into a modern day Sodom and Gamorrah

All that to explain why an overtly Christian presidential candidate like Bush was in 200 was an exciting prospect, particularly since al gore had two strikes against him. One, he dropped out of seminary, which raises paranoid suspicions he has rejected Christianity whether he actually has or not. Two, he was big into environmentalism. Anything beyond reasonable conservationism is flirting with pagan nature worship where I am from.

Regent university reminded me of the worst aspects of Christian fundamentalism, I think I largely dropped any spiritual concerns during the 2004 election. Strange, because it was largely about the clash between Western, Christian civilization and Muslim barbarism. Yeah, there was none of that religion of peace political correctness stuff at Regent. I still relatively unenthusiastically supported Bush on national security grounds.

John McCain in 2008…ugh. I was definitely voting against Barack Obama that time around, I referred to McCain as Otto von Bismarch from the moment he started campaigning. I must admit Sarah Palin as McCain’s running mate did make the deal sweeter, mostly because progressives hated her. You can judge a person well by their detractors. Then again, there was a great deal of enthusiasm for her christian character.

To (finally) answer your second question, I am honestly not sure right now. I am highly motivated to defeat Obama, and am willing to vote for pretty much anyone else just to get rid of him. Argue the point if you wish, but I suspect Obama is an atheist. Irreligious at the very least. I still have twinges that God will not bless a country whose leadership does not keep Him in His proper place--above all else. If nothing else, I fear his anti-Israel position has brought God’s promise to Abraham to bless them that bless Israel and curse them that curse Israel upon us. In that sense, electing a devout Christian like Palin, Michele Bachmann, or Rick Perry feels like we would be making needed apologies to god. Any one of them would be a step in the right direction.

Is there one I am most excited about? I still like Palin. There is something about Bachmann that screams unelectable. I do not know if Perry will even run, much less have the juice to win. I think the urge to get rid of Obama outweighs any enthusiasm for a particular candidate, but since Palin quickly came to mind first even though there is still a question she will even run, I imagine I would be excited to vote for her. We shall see. Maybe.

7/18/11

Formspring Question #212--Progressivism is Authoritative Edition

If you truly are supportive of individuals doing anything they choose as long as it does no one else harm, then you ought to be a liberal. Liberalism levels the playing field for people to have more freedom to do as they wish.
You have inadvertently stated the exact reason I believe conservatism has more to do with allowing personal freedom than progressivism. I can tell, even by what little you have said, that you have no clue how authoritarian progressivism is.

It is progressivism that advocates forcibly redistributing wealth. Progressivism compels you to buy health insurance. Progressivism dictates social justice. These days, progressives want to tell you what kind of light bulb you can use. There is not any decision that can be made a progressive government is not interested in dictating guidelines for or out and out forcing a sole option on you.

Even when labeling something a freedom, it is an Orwellian term of art. Take pro-choice for instance. It sounds nice, right? A woman should have the freedom to do what she wants with her body? But there is no promotion of choice. The pro-life position is not only not given equal weight, it is a thoroughly demonized position . There is a prevailing notion even the father of a child on the brink of being aborted ought have no say. In the child’s fate. Where is the freedom of choice in any of that?

When it comes to practically all matters, progressivism only offers one option. The consequences of resisting are severe.

I am not naïve. I understand people of all political persuasions want as much power as they can get. But in my observations, I have seen ideologically progressivism wield its influence in a far more authoritative manner than does ideologically pure conservatism. I would rather take my chances with individuals choosing for themselves how to run their lives than be dictated to by a monolithic government. The latter is not a level playing field, I assure you.

Formspring Question #211--Andromeda Strained Edition

Did you ever watch Andromeda? I am not suggesting it: it was VERY quality inconsistent. But if you can get through that the premise was dark enough that you would have enjoyed it.
I watched a couple episodes a few years ago on the Sci Fi Channel. It did not hook me. From little I saw, the quality of it reminded me of Earth: Final Conflict in the sense Majel Roddenberry was clearly going through her late husband’s notes and selling off the rights to any half-baked idea Gene Roddenberry ever had. Considering how many of his fully baked ideas are suspect, you can imagine how I feel about Andromeda.

Granted, I have seen very little of it, but literally every person who has recommended it to me as done so in the same way you have--it is not that great, it went down hill quickly, but it is dark and edgy. I spent a lot of time in the world of comic books where dark and edgy in the post frank Miller The Dark Knight returns was synonymous with good. That was rarely enough to float my boat. Grim and gritty for the sake of grim and gritty is not enough.

If you are subtly asking if I might revierw Andromeda some day, I doubt it. It would be so far down the list of potential shows I would watch, it might as well not even be on the list at all. A fan may make a sales pitch if desired, but my feelings above have to be refuted and even then, patience, patience, and more patience. There is a lot of better stuff out there to be cover first.

7/14/11

Formspring Question #210--Regular or Sarcastic Edition

Does the word irregular now mean daily?
I have been posting the old commercials all week for you to get a feel of what to expect from it. It will become a random, irregular feature after today.

Sheesh.

Formspring Question #209--Cool Cat Edition

What's with the switching of cat avatars? The other one was cute!
The new cat suits my personality better than the hipster cat i had before.

Formspring Question #208--Forget It Edition

with Unforgettable premiering in the fall, is there any chance you might post photos of Poppy Montgomery?
Unforgettable is a show in which Poppy Montgomery, whom I had not heard of until Googling, plays a detective with unberphotographic memory. She remembers every detail of every second of her life. The premise does not grab me, and considering the slow death of scripted television in general, I doubt it grabs many others. I have no interest in even giving it a shot.

Get your Poppy Montgomery while you can:

7/12/11

Formspring Question #208--Lighting Up Torchwood Edition

Did you see Torchwood: Miracle Day yet? Love to hear what you thought.
I was underwhelmed. I feared the show my be dumbed down for American audiences, and I got the vibe it had been. The first episode did not compel me to review it. The second might, but do not hold me to it.

Truth be told, I spent most of the first episode deciding if Eve Myles had some work done for her American debut.

Formspring Question #207--No Enterprising Effort Edition

1st season TNG or 4th season Enterprise? Which do you prefer?
I was willing to review all of TNG. I am not going to review any of ENT.